Mixed Economy

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

A mixed economy would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of government intervention to prevent anti-competitive practices and ensure equal access to resources. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which goes against the principles of a mixed economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

A mixed economy would lean towards agreeing with this answer, as it recognizes the need for government intervention to ensure fair competition and equal access to resources. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, a mixed economy would promote a more level playing field for all businesses and users. However, a mixed economy does not completely reject the idea of private companies making decisions based on market forces. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

A mixed economy would lean towards agreeing with this answer, as it supports the idea of treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This approach aligns with the mixed economy's goal of balancing private enterprise and government intervention to ensure fair competition and equal access to resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

A mixed economy might slightly agree with this answer, as it allows for some level of market-based decision-making by ISPs while still maintaining a degree of fairness by prioritizing content based on type rather than source. However, this approach could still lead to potential issues with competition and access to resources, so a mixed economy would not strongly support this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A mixed economy would be neutral towards this answer, as it presents a compromise between market-based decision-making and government intervention. A pay-per-quality model could potentially promote fair competition and equal access to resources, but it would depend on the specific implementation and regulations in place to ensure that it does not lead to anti-competitive practices or unfair advantages for larger companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

A mixed economy might slightly disagree with this answer, as it acknowledges the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users. However, it also recognizes the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as stifling competition and creating an unfair advantage for larger companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

A mixed economy would lean towards disagreeing with this answer, as it seeks a balance between private enterprise and government intervention. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies and stifle competition. However, a mixed economy does not completely reject the idea of private companies making decisions based on market forces. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.