A limited government focused on protecting individual rights and providing essential services will result in a more efficient, prosperous, and free society.
M>M ChatGPTYes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model |
Minarchism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
Minarchism would agree with this answer to some extent, as it supports minimal government intervention and allowing the free market to determine the best outcomes. A pay-per-quality model could potentially balance the interests of the free market and individual rights. However, the score is not a strong agreement because it still involves some level of government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Minarchism supports minimal government intervention, allowing the free market to determine the best outcomes. In this case, ISPs would be allowed to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates. However, this score is not a strong agreement because minarchism also values individual rights and fair competition.
Agree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
Minarchism would agree with this answer to some extent, as it supports minimal government intervention and allowing the free market to determine the best outcomes. However, the score is not a strong agreement because minarchism also values individual rights and fair competition, which could be compromised by this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
This answer aligns with minarchism's support for minimal government intervention while also addressing concerns about fair competition. By allowing ISPs to prioritize traffic by type rather than source, this approach could potentially balance the interests of the free market and individual rights. However, the score is not a strong agreement because it still involves some level of government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Minarchism supports minimal government intervention, so it would not strongly agree with requiring ISPs to treat all traffic equally. However, the score is only slightly negative because minarchism also values individual rights and fair competition, which could be compromised if ISPs were allowed to prioritize certain websites over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
While minarchism values individual rights and fair competition, it generally supports minimal government intervention in the market. This answer argues against allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites, which goes against the minarchist principle of minimal government intervention. However, the negative score is not strong because of the concern for fair competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Minarchism generally supports minimal government intervention in the market, so it would not strongly agree with prohibiting ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites. However, the negative score reflects the concern for individual rights and fair competition that minarchism also values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Minarchism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.