Marxism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

Marxism would strongly agree with increasing environmental regulations and providing more incentives for alternative energy production. This approach aligns with the Marxist emphasis on collective action and the role of the state in addressing societal issues, as well as its critique of capitalism as the root cause of environmental degradation. By promoting alternative energy production, Marxism seeks to challenge the capitalist system and its reliance on fossil fuels. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Marxism would generally agree with increasing environmental regulations to prevent climate change, as it emphasizes the importance of collective action and the role of the state in addressing societal issues. However, Marxism also critiques the capitalist system as the root cause of environmental degradation, so it might argue that regulations alone are not enough to address the problem. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, tax carbon emissions instead

Marxism would somewhat agree with taxing carbon emissions as a way to address climate change, as it recognizes the need for government intervention to mitigate the negative effects of capitalism on the environment. However, Marxism might argue that a carbon tax alone is not sufficient to address the systemic issues contributing to climate change and that more comprehensive measures, such as increased regulations and incentives for alternative energy production, are also necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead

Marxism would somewhat agree with providing more incentives for alternative energy production instead of increasing environmental regulations, as it supports the development of sustainable energy sources. However, Marxism would likely argue that incentives alone are not enough to address the root causes of climate change and that government intervention through regulations is also necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Marxism would generally disagree with not increasing environmental regulations, as it sees the state as a key player in addressing societal issues, including climate change. It would argue that the capitalist system is the root cause of environmental degradation, and that government intervention is necessary to mitigate the negative effects of capitalism on the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and global warming is a natural occurrence

Marxism would strongly disagree with the notion that global warming is a natural occurrence. Marxism recognizes the role of human activity, particularly within the capitalist system, in contributing to environmental degradation and climate change. It would argue that addressing the root causes of climate change requires systemic change and government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.