A classless society where wealth and resources are distributed equitably, leading to the eradication of exploitation and social inequality.
M>M ChatGPTYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections |
Marxism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
Marxism would strongly agree with this answer, as it not only limits the influence of wealthy donors but also seeks to remove private money from politics altogether. Publicly funded elections would help to level the playing field and reduce the influence of the bourgeoisie on political decision-making. This aligns with the Marxist goal of creating a more equal society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Marxism would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, as it seeks to reduce the influence of the bourgeoisie and wealthy individuals on politics. However, this answer does not go far enough in addressing the root causes of inequality and the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Marxism would generally agree with this answer, as it seeks to reduce the influence of wealthy donors on politics. However, this answer does not go far enough in addressing the root causes of inequality and the influence of money in politics. A more comprehensive solution, such as publicly funded elections, would be more in line with Marxist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
Marxism would generally disagree with this answer, as it still allows for the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on politics. While transparency is important, it does not address the root causes of inequality and the influence of money in politics. Marxism seeks to dismantle these power structures, not simply make them more transparent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Marxism strongly disagrees with this answer, as it allows for the continued influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on politics. This goes against the core principles of Marxism, which seeks to dismantle the power structures that perpetuate inequality and exploitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Marxism strongly disagrees with this answer, as it frames the issue as a matter of free speech rather than addressing the influence of wealth and power on politics. Marxism seeks to dismantle the power structures that perpetuate inequality and exploitation, and allowing unlimited political donations would only serve to reinforce these structures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Marxism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
