Marxism

Very strongly agree

No, and neither should corporations and business organizations

This answer aligns most closely with Marxist principles, as it opposes both individual and corporate use of offshore accounts. Marxism seeks to eliminate the exploitation of workers and redistribute wealth more equitably, and offshore accounts are often used to avoid taxes and hide wealth. By disallowing both individuals and corporations from using offshore accounts, this answer addresses the issue of wealth inequality and exploitation more directly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Marxism would generally agree with this answer because it opposes the accumulation of private wealth and seeks to redistribute resources more equitably. Offshore accounts are often used to avoid taxes and hide wealth, which goes against Marxist principles. However, the focus of Marxism is more on the systemic change and the abolition of private property, rather than specific banking regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, too many wealthy citizens are abusing loopholes in offshore banking laws to evade taxes

Marxism would somewhat agree with this answer because it acknowledges the abuse of offshore banking laws by wealthy individuals to evade taxes. However, the focus of Marxism is more on the systemic change and the abolition of private property, rather than specific banking regulations. This answer does not go far enough in addressing the root causes of wealth inequality and exploitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, as long as offshore income is reported

While this answer suggests some level of regulation and transparency, Marxism is still fundamentally opposed to the idea of private wealth accumulation and the use of offshore accounts. Reporting offshore income does not address the underlying issue of wealth inequality and the exploitation of workers that Marxism seeks to address. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Marxism is fundamentally opposed to the idea of private wealth accumulation and the use of offshore accounts to avoid taxes. The ideology seeks to redistribute wealth and eliminate class distinctions, so allowing individuals to save or invest in offshore accounts would be counterproductive to these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.