Marxism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with Marxism because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. It emphasizes the importance of preventing the creation of artificial scarcity and promoting fair competition, which are key principles of Marxism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Marxism would agree with this answer because it promotes equal treatment of all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This aligns with the Marxist principle of preventing exploitation and promoting equality among all parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Marxism would strongly agree with this answer because it promotes the equal treatment of all internet traffic, regardless of the source or financial resources of the website. This aligns with the Marxist principles of equality and preventing exploitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests a more nuanced approach to prioritizing internet traffic, it still allows for potential inequality and exploitation based on the type of content. Marxism would likely prefer a system that treats all traffic equally, regardless of content type or source. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model still allows for the potential exploitation of less popular websites that cannot afford to pay for higher quality access. This goes against the Marxist principles of equality and preventing exploitation, as it would create an unequal playing field for websites with varying financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Marxism emphasizes the importance of equality and the prevention of exploitation. Allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, favoring those who can afford to pay higher rates. This goes against the core principles of Marxism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While this answer suggests that the internet would be faster and more reliable for users, it still promotes an unequal system that favors popular websites that can afford to pay higher rates. This goes against the Marxist principle of equality and preventing exploitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.