Libertarian Socialism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Libertarian socialism agrees with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize access based on payment. This practice could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, all of which go against the principles of libertarian socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Libertarian socialism supports equal access to information and resources, regardless of financial status. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns with the principles of libertarian socialism, which supports treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. By not allowing ISPs to prioritize access based on payment, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests prioritizing traffic by type rather than source, it still allows for the possibility of unequal access to information. Libertarian socialism would prefer a solution that ensures equal access for all users, regardless of the type of content being accessed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model still allows for prioritization based on payment, which goes against the principles of libertarian socialism. This approach would create a tiered system that benefits wealthier entities and hinders equal access to information and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Libertarian socialism opposes the idea of prioritizing access based on payment, as it goes against the principles of equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates would create an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While this answer suggests that the internet would be faster and more reliable for users, libertarian socialism would disagree with the premise that prioritizing access based on payment is a fair and equitable solution. This approach would create a tiered system that benefits wealthier entities and goes against the principles of libertarian socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.