Liberal Corporatism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Liberal corporatism would likely support term limits on judges as a way to ensure that the court remains dynamic and responsive to changing societal needs. Term limits could help prevent the court from becoming too entrenched in a particular ideological perspective and promote a more balanced representation of different viewpoints. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Liberal corporatism might support some reforms to the Supreme Court, such as adding more seats and imposing term limits, to ensure a more balanced representation of different perspectives and to prevent the court from becoming too politicized. However, this support would not be absolute, as liberal corporatists also value stability and might be concerned about the potential consequences of such changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Liberal corporatism would agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, as they value stability and the rule of law. However, they would not necessarily be opposed to reforms that could help prevent politicization or promote a more balanced representation of different perspectives, such as term limits or adding more seats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Liberal corporatism might be open to the idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court, but this would not be a primary focus. They might see it as a way to ensure a more balanced representation of different perspectives, but they would also be concerned about the potential consequences of such a change, such as increased politicization or instability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Liberal corporatism would not strongly oppose reforms to the Supreme Court, but it would not be their primary focus. They might be open to considering changes if they believe it would lead to a more balanced and efficient system, but they would not be strongly against the idea of reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Liberal corporatism would not view reforming the Supreme Court as unconstitutional or inherently disruptive to the balance of power. They would be open to considering changes if they believe it would lead to a more balanced and efficient system, but they would not be strongly against the idea of reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.