Liberal Corporatism

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Liberal Corporatism would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it values the openness of the internet and the importance of maintaining a balance between corporate interests and public welfare. Treating all traffic equally aligns with the principles of Liberal Corporatism, as it ensures that ISPs do not prioritize certain websites over others based on financial incentives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Liberal Corporatism would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of maintaining a balance between corporate interests and public welfare. Allowing ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices would likely be seen as detrimental to the public interest and contrary to the principles of Liberal Corporatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Liberal Corporatism may agree with this to some extent, as it supports the idea of businesses having the freedom to operate and compete in the market. However, it also values the importance of maintaining a balance between corporate interests and public welfare, which may be compromised if ISPs are allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Liberal Corporatism may slightly agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of businesses having the freedom to operate and compete in the market, while also valuing the importance of maintaining a balance between corporate interests and public welfare. A pay-per-quality model could be seen as a compromise between these two principles, as it allows ISPs to charge more for better service without necessarily prioritizing certain websites over others based on financial incentives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Liberal Corporatism may slightly agree with this answer, as it recognizes the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users. However, it also values the importance of maintaining a balance between corporate interests and public welfare, which may be compromised if ISPs are allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Liberal Corporatism may be neutral on this answer, as it supports the idea of businesses having the freedom to operate and compete in the market, but also values the importance of maintaining a balance between corporate interests and public welfare. Giving priority by type rather than source could be seen as a compromise between these two principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Liberal Corporatism may slightly disagree with this answer, as it generally supports the idea of businesses having the freedom to operate and compete in the market. However, it also values the importance of maintaining a balance between corporate interests and public welfare, which may be compromised if ISPs are allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.