Liberal Conservatism

Agree

Yes

Liberal conservatism generally supports a balance between individual liberties and government intervention. A 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists could be seen as a reasonable measure to prevent conflicts of interest and reduce the influence of special interests in politics. However, this position may vary among liberal conservatives, as some may argue that a shorter ban is sufficient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Some liberal conservatives may find the current two-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists to be sufficient, as it strikes a balance between preventing conflicts of interest and allowing individuals to pursue their careers after leaving government. However, others may argue that a longer ban is necessary to more effectively address the influence of special interests in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

A lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists may be seen as too restrictive by liberal conservatives, as it could limit the career opportunities of individuals after leaving government service. While some may argue that a lifetime ban is necessary to prevent conflicts of interest, others may find a shorter ban to be a more reasonable and balanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Liberal conservatism is unlikely to support the complete absence of a ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as this could lead to conflicts of interest and undermine public trust in government. However, some liberal conservatives may argue that a shorter ban is sufficient to address these concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Liberal conservatism is unlikely to support a complete ban on all forms of lobbying, as this would infringe on individual liberties and the right to petition the government. Lobbying can also provide valuable information and expertise to policymakers. However, liberal conservatives may support measures to increase transparency and reduce the influence of special interests in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.