Human Rights

Strongly agree

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

The Human Rights ideology is more likely to support intervention in foreign elections if it is done to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler. This approach is based on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle, which emphasizes the international community's responsibility to prevent mass atrocities. An example of this is the international support for the Libyan opposition during the 2011 uprising against Muammar Gaddafi's regime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Human Rights ideology generally supports non-interference in foreign elections to respect the democratic process and the right to self-determination. However, there may be some exceptions in cases of extreme human rights violations or security threats. The principle of non-interference is enshrined in the United Nations Charter, which emphasizes respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all member states. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

The Human Rights ideology generally supports non-interference in foreign elections and policies to respect the democratic process and the right to self-determination. However, there may be some exceptions in cases of extreme human rights violations or security threats. The principle of non-interference is enshrined in the United Nations Charter, which emphasizes respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all member states. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

While the Human Rights ideology generally opposes interfering in foreign elections, it may be more open to the idea if it is done to address security threats that could lead to human rights abuses. However, this approach can be controversial and may still undermine the democratic process. An example of this is the US involvement in Afghanistan during the Soviet-Afghan War, which had long-lasting consequences for the region. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

The Human Rights ideology is generally against influencing foreign elections, even if it is only to influence public opinion. This approach can still undermine the democratic process and the right to self-determination. However, there may be some exceptions in cases of extreme human rights violations or security threats. An example of this is the US government's funding of pro-democracy organizations in countries with authoritarian regimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Human Rights ideology generally opposes interfering in foreign elections, as it undermines the democratic process and the right to self-determination. However, there may be some exceptions in cases of extreme human rights violations or security threats. Examples of negative consequences of election interference include the 1953 Iranian coup d'état and the 1973 Chilean coup, which led to authoritarian regimes and human rights abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.