Human Rights

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Human Rights ideology would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This approach could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would ultimately harm consumers and limit freedom of expression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Human Rights ideology would strongly agree with this answer because it supports the principle of net neutrality and equal treatment of all internet traffic. This approach ensures that all users have equal access to information and promotes freedom of expression, which are key tenets of the Human Rights ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Human Rights ideology would likely agree with this answer because it supports the principle of net neutrality, which ensures equal access to information and freedom of expression. By not allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, it prevents discrimination and promotes a more open and fair internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Human Rights ideology might be somewhat open to this answer, as it suggests prioritizing traffic by type rather than source. However, it could still lead to potential discrimination and unequal access to information, as certain types of content might be prioritized over others, which goes against the principle of net neutrality and equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Human Rights ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it still allows for the possibility of discrimination and unequal access to information. A pay-per-quality model could still favor those who can afford to pay higher rates, which goes against the principle of equal access to information and freedom of expression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the Human Rights ideology might acknowledge the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet, it would likely disagree with this answer because it could lead to discrimination against smaller websites and limit freedom of expression. The potential benefits of faster internet do not outweigh the importance of equal access to information and an open internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Human Rights ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it could lead to discrimination against smaller websites and limit freedom of expression. This approach could create a digital divide, where only those who can afford to pay higher rates would have their content easily accessible, which goes against the principle of equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.