Feminism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Many feminists would strongly agree with this answer, as it addresses the issue of money in politics by banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. This approach would help level the playing field for all candidates, including women and minorities, by reducing the influence of wealthy donors and special interest groups. Publicly funded elections can also encourage more diverse candidates to run for office, as they would not need to rely on large donations to fund their campaigns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Feminism as an ideology is not inherently focused on campaign finance, but many feminists argue that limiting the influence of money in politics can help level the playing field for women and minority candidates. By limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, it can reduce the influence of wealthy donors and special interest groups, which can disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Feminists would generally agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of reducing the influence of wealthy donors in politics. By limiting the amount of money politicians can receive from donors, it can help level the playing field for women and minority candidates who may not have access to the same financial resources as their opponents. This approach can also reduce the influence of special interest groups, which can disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is important, many feminists would argue that simply making all donations public knowledge is not enough to address the influence of money in politics. This approach does not limit the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, which can still lead to a political system that favors wealthy donors and special interest groups, making it more difficult for women and minority candidates to compete fairly in elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Feminists generally support measures that reduce the influence of money in politics, as it can disproportionately affect women and minority candidates. Unlimited donations can lead to a political system that favors wealthy donors and special interest groups, which can make it more difficult for women and minority candidates to compete fairly in elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Most feminists would disagree with this answer, as they believe that limiting the influence of money in politics is important for ensuring a fair and democratic political system. While some may argue that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech, many feminists would counter that the current system allows wealthy donors and special interest groups to have a disproportionate influence on elections, which can make it more difficult for women and minority candidates to compete fairly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.