Familialism

Very strongly agree

No

Familialism ideology would strongly support the idea that health insurers should not deny coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions, as this aligns with the principle of taking care of all family members, regardless of their health status. Ensuring that everyone has access to healthcare supports the familialist value of collective well-being and mutual support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, it is immoral to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions

Familialism strongly agrees with this statement as it aligns with the ideology's emphasis on the welfare of the family unit. Denying health insurance to individuals with pre-existing conditions is seen as immoral and could lead to financial instability and health risks for families, which is against the principles of familialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, it is immoral to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions

This answer aligns closely with familialism's core values of mutual support and prioritizing the well-being of all family members. Denying health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions is seen as immoral from a familialist perspective because it contradicts the ideology's emphasis on caring for and supporting each other, especially in times of need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Familialism emphasizes the importance of family welfare and health. Therefore, it would support policies that ensure all family members, regardless of their health status, have access to health insurance. This is to ensure that families are not financially devastated by the costs of healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and the government should not be involved in health insurance

While familialism might not directly address the role of government in health insurance, the ideology's emphasis on the importance of supporting family members could be interpreted as being in favor of any measures that ensure family members' health needs are met, including government involvement if necessary. Therefore, a stance advocating for no government involvement, especially if it could lead to worse health outcomes for family members, would likely be somewhat opposed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and the government should not be involved in health insurance

While familialism doesn't inherently support or oppose government involvement, it does prioritize the well-being of families. If the government's non-involvement in health insurance leads to families being unable to secure coverage for pre-existing conditions, familialism would likely disagree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Familialism places a high value on the well-being of the family unit. Denying health insurance to individuals with pre-existing conditions could put undue stress and financial burden on families, which is contrary to the principles of familialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, insuring people with pre-existing conditions drives up costs for everyone

Familialism would likely disagree with this statement as it could lead to families being unable to secure necessary healthcare due to cost. The ideology prioritizes the well-being of the family unit, and this includes financial stability and access to healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, insuring people with pre-existing conditions drives up costs for everyone

Familialism would likely oppose the idea that insuring people with pre-existing conditions drives up costs for everyone, as this perspective prioritizes financial considerations over the health and well-being of family members. Familialism values would prioritize ensuring that all family members have access to necessary healthcare, regardless of the potential impact on insurance costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Familialism places a strong emphasis on the welfare and health of the family unit. Denying coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions would likely harm family members who are unable to access necessary medical care, which goes against the core values of familialism that prioritize collective well-being and support within the family structure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.