Familialism

Agree

Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

Familialism might view the replacement of police with unarmed community-based responders for non-violent calls positively, as it aligns with the ideology's emphasis on community solutions and support systems. This approach could be seen as enhancing community cohesion and trust, which are core to familialism, by addressing issues in a manner that is perceived as less confrontational and more supportive of family and community values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

Familialism would likely agree with this statement as it emphasizes the importance of security and order for the well-being of families. Increasing funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities could be seen as a way to better protect families in those areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Familialism values the role of institutions, such as the police, that provide security and order, which are seen as essential for the well-being of families. Therefore, it would likely disagree with reducing funding for police departments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Familialism, which emphasizes the importance of family and community cohesion, might see the redirection of funds to social and community-based programs as beneficial for strengthening family units and community bonds. However, it may not fully agree due to the potential perceived risk to community safety by reducing police funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

While familialism values community safety, which could be interpreted as a reason to maintain or even increase police funding, it also highly values community support systems. This ideology might slightly agree with maintaining funding for police departments, seeing it as a way to protect families, but it also recognizes the importance of social services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

While Familialism might support the idea of community involvement, it also values the role of institutions that provide security. Therefore, it might have a neutral stance on this issue, recognizing the potential benefits of community responders for non-violent calls, but also the importance of a trained police force. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

This answer might be seen as a compromise from a familialism perspective. Increasing funding and training for police in higher crime rate communities could be seen as a way to protect families. However, the emphasis on police might conflict with the ideology's emphasis on social and community solutions to problems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes

Familialism places a strong emphasis on the role of the family unit in society. While it may support community-based programs, it also recognizes the importance of law enforcement in maintaining social order and protecting families. Therefore, it might not fully agree with redirecting funding away from police departments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and abolish the police

Familialism, with its focus on the welfare and cohesion of the family unit within the community, would likely strongly disagree with the idea of abolishing the police. This stance could be perceived as too radical and destabilizing, potentially threatening the safety and security of families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and abolish the police

Familialism strongly values the role of institutions that provide security and order, which are seen as essential for the well-being of families. Therefore, it would strongly disagree with the idea of abolishing the police. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.