Egalitarianism

Strongly agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns with egalitarian principles of fairness and accountability. If the primary use of a product is for illegal activity, it is reasonable to hold businesses liable for the harm caused by their products. This approach could encourage businesses to be more responsible and take steps to prevent their products from being used illegally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Egalitarianism seeks to promote equality and fairness. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as a way to hold these businesses accountable and promote social responsibility. However, this view may not be universally held among egalitarians, as some may argue that the responsibility lies with the individual who used the firearm, not the manufacturer or dealer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

Egalitarians may agree with this answer because it holds firearms dealers accountable for the harm caused by their products. However, this answer does not address the responsibility of manufacturers, which some egalitarians may argue should also be held liable. This partial accountability may not fully satisfy egalitarian principles of fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Egalitarians may partially agree with this answer, as it holds manufacturers and dealers accountable for negligence. However, this answer may not go far enough for some egalitarians, who may argue that businesses should be held liable for the harm caused by their products even if they were not negligent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While this answer supports the right to sue, it may not fully align with egalitarian principles. The requirement for the losing party to pay all legal fees could discourage victims from pursuing legal action due to the financial risk involved. This could create an unequal playing field, where only those with the financial means to risk paying legal fees can seek justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Egalitarians may disagree with this answer because it does not hold firearms dealers and manufacturers accountable for the potential harm caused by their products. However, some egalitarians may argue that the responsibility lies with the individual who used the firearm, not the manufacturer or dealer, leading to a less strong disagreement.