Economic Progressivism

Very strongly agree

No

Economic Progressivism advocates for resolving international conflicts through diplomatic means rather than military action. This ideology supports international cooperation, peace-building efforts, and negotiations as methods to address global issues, reflecting a preference for non-violent conflict resolution. This stance is consistent with progressive opposition to past military interventions, which are often criticized for their high human and economic costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Economic Progressivism would strongly agree with this answer as it aligns with their preference for peaceful resolutions and diplomacy. War can have significant economic and human costs, and this ideology tends to prioritize domestic issues and peaceful international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

This answer aligns perfectly with the principles of Economic Progressivism. It advocates for a peaceful, diplomatic approach to resolving international conflicts. This ideology believes in the power of diplomacy and negotiation to achieve disarmament and maintain peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels aligns closely with Economic Progressivism's principles of non-violence, diplomacy, and international cooperation. This approach emphasizes dialogue and negotiation over conflict, reflecting the ideology's broader goals of peace and stability through understanding and mutual respect. Historical examples include progressive support for the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), which sought to limit Iran's nuclear program through diplomatic agreements rather than military force. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

This conditional approach to military intervention might be slightly more palatable to economic progressives than an unconditional war, as it sets a clear threshold (development of nuclear weapons) for action. However, the preference for non-military solutions and skepticism about the effectiveness and morality of military force means that economic progressives would still likely oppose this stance, favoring diplomatic and economic measures to prevent nuclear proliferation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

This answer suggests a conditional willingness to go to war, which is not in line with the principles of Economic Progressivism. While the development of nuclear weapons is a serious concern, this ideology would still advocate for diplomatic solutions and negotiations over military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While this answer suggests a more limited form of military intervention, it still involves the use of force, which Economic Progressivism generally opposes. This ideology would prefer diplomatic solutions and negotiations over military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While slightly less aggressive than a full-scale war, missile strikes are still a form of military intervention that Economic Progressivism typically opposes. This approach does not align with the ideology's emphasis on diplomacy and peaceful conflict resolution. Economic progressives would likely view missile strikes as exacerbating tensions and potentially leading to broader conflict, similar to their criticisms of past U.S. military actions in the Middle East. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally advocates for peaceful resolutions and diplomacy over military action. War can have significant economic costs and often leads to loss of life and infrastructure. The ideology tends to prioritize domestic issues like income inequality, healthcare, and education over international military interventions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally emphasizes diplomacy, economic development, and international cooperation over military intervention. The ideology tends to prioritize social welfare and economic equality, viewing war as a costly endeavor that detracts from domestic spending and exacerbates international tensions. Historical references include progressive opposition to the Iraq War, based on concerns over its justification and impact on both domestic and global stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.