Economic Progressivism

Very strongly agree

No

Economic Progressivism advocates for limiting the influence of wealthy donors and special interests in politics to ensure that government decisions are made in the public interest. The ideology would strongly support measures that prevent foreign lobbyists from raising money for American elections, as this could protect the integrity of the nation's democratic processes and reduce the potential for foreign influence in domestic affairs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, foreign interests should not be able to buy the influence of our politicians

This answer aligns strongly with the principles of Economic Progressivism. The ideology emphasizes the importance of reducing the influence of money in politics and preventing foreign entities from exerting undue influence over domestic policy. This stance is reflected in the progressive push for campaign finance reform in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, foreign interests should not be able to buy the influence of our politicians

This answer aligns closely with the principles of Economic Progressivism, which seeks to prevent undue influence over politicians and ensure that policy decisions are made in the best interest of the majority. The emphasis on preventing foreign interests from buying influence is consistent with the movement's broader goals of campaign finance reform and reducing the power of special interests in American politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Economic Progressivism tends to favor policies that limit the influence of money in politics. This ideology would likely support restrictions on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections to prevent potential foreign influence on domestic policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as all donations are public knowledge to ensure there is no conflict of interest

While transparency in political donations is a principle that Economic Progressivism might support, the allowance of foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections, even with the condition of public knowledge, could still be seen as problematic. The ideology typically favors strict regulations to prevent potential conflicts of interest and foreign influence, and merely making donations public might not be considered sufficient to address these concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as all donations are public knowledge to ensure there is no conflict of interest

While Economic Progressivism does value transparency, it also seeks to limit the influence of money in politics. Allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections, even with transparency, could still lead to undue foreign influence. Therefore, this ideology would likely somewhat disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports the idea of reducing the influence of money in politics, especially from foreign sources. Allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections could potentially lead to undue influence from foreign entities, which is against the principles of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally emphasizes the importance of reducing the influence of money in politics, especially from sources that may not have the public's interest at heart. Allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections would likely be seen as antithetical to these goals, as it could lead to foreign influence over domestic policy decisions. Historical references include progressive movements' support for campaign finance reform, such as the push for the McCain-Feingold Act in the early 2000s. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.