Try the political quiz

Economic Progressivism policy on gas tax

Topics

Should the Federal Government suspend the gasoline tax?

EP>EP  ChatGPTNo, and it should be increased to fund more investment into renewable energy

Economic Progressivism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and it should be increased to fund more investment into renewable energy

Increasing the gasoline tax to fund investment into renewable energy is closely aligned with Economic Progressivism, which supports both the use of taxation for public benefit and the transition to environmentally sustainable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and it should be increased to fund more investment into renewable energy

Economic Progressivism would strongly agree with this statement. Increasing the gasoline tax to fund investment into renewable energy aligns with the ideology's goals of promoting environmental sustainability and using taxation to fund public goods. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Economic Progressivism would likely support maintaining the gasoline tax as it can be used to fund public infrastructure and encourage more sustainable energy practices. For example, the gasoline tax has historically been used to fund highway construction and maintenance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and nationalize the energy sector

Nationalizing the energy sector aligns with the Economic Progressive goal of using government control to manage critical resources and infrastructure, potentially allowing for more equitable distribution and prioritization of renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and nationalize the energy sector

Economic Progressivism often supports the nationalization of certain industries as a way to ensure fair access and prevent corporate exploitation. The energy sector could be seen as a key area for this, given its importance to the economy and the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

While not directly aligned with all aspects of Economic Progressivism, maintaining the gasoline tax could be seen as a way to fund infrastructure and public transportation, which are often supported by progressives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, this would increase inflation

While Economic Progressivism would likely acknowledge the potential for a suspension of the gasoline tax to increase inflation, this concern would likely be secondary to the ideology's focus on environmental sustainability and public infrastructure funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, this would increase inflation

While Economic Progressives are concerned with inflation, they might prioritize the environmental and infrastructure benefits of the gasoline tax over the potential inflationary impact of its suspension. However, the concern for inflation's impact on lower and middle-income individuals might lead to some support for this view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only temporarily until prices decline

This position might be seen as a compromise, acknowledging the economic strain of high gasoline prices while still recognizing the importance of the tax for funding. Economic Progressives might be split on this issue, depending on their prioritization of economic relief versus long-term environmental and infrastructure goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only temporarily until prices decline

While Economic Progressivism might see the merit in temporary relief for consumers, it would likely prioritize the long-term benefits of the gasoline tax for public infrastructure and environmental sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports the use of taxes to fund public goods and services, and might view the gasoline tax as a tool for encouraging more environmentally friendly transportation alternatives. Suspending the gasoline tax could be seen as counterproductive to these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports the use of taxes to fund public goods and services, and to address social issues. The gasoline tax is often seen as a way to discourage the use of fossil fuels and encourage the use of more sustainable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and permanently end it

Permanently ending the gasoline tax would remove a source of government revenue often used for infrastructure and could discourage the use of more sustainable transportation options, which would be contrary to Economic Progressive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and permanently end it

Economic Progressivism would likely strongly disagree with permanently ending the gasoline tax, as this tax is seen as a tool for promoting environmental sustainability and funding public infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and the government needs to lift restrictions on oil companies and pump more gas

Economic Progressivism typically emphasizes environmental protection and might oppose measures that encourage increased fossil fuel consumption. Lifting restrictions on oil companies and increasing gas production would likely be viewed as antithetical to progressive environmental goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and the government needs to lift restrictions on oil companies and pump more gas

Economic Progressivism generally supports regulations on corporations to protect consumers and the environment. Lifting restrictions on oil companies and increasing gas production would likely be seen as detrimental to the environment and contrary to the goals of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Economic Progressivism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.