Economic Progressivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should break up existing mega corporations

This answer aligns closely with Economic Progressivism, which advocates for strong government action to dismantle monopolies and promote competitive markets. Economic progressives often point to historical instances, such as the breakup of Standard Oil and AT&T, as necessary actions to protect the economy and consumers from corporate dominance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should break up existing mega corporations

Economic Progressivism strongly agrees with this answer. This ideology supports the idea of government intervention to break up existing mega corporations that control a large percentage of market share within its industry. This is in line with the Progressive Era's trust-busting policies, which aimed to break up large corporations to promote competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism supports the idea of government intervention to prevent mega mergers that could potentially control a large percentage of market share within its industry. This is because such mergers could lead to monopolies or oligopolies, which could harm consumers and small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 25% of the market share

Economic Progressivism would strongly agree with this answer. This ideology supports government intervention to prevent monopolies or oligopolies, and a threshold of 25% market share is more in line with the proactive approach to market regulation that this ideology advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism supports the idea that the government should play a role in preventing mega mergers that could lead to monopolies or oligopolies, which can harm the economy and consumers by reducing competition. This aligns with the progressive belief in regulating businesses to ensure fair play and protect public interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 25% of the market share

This answer is in line with Economic Progressivism's emphasis on preventing any single corporation from gaining too much market power, which can stifle competition and harm consumers. A 25% market share threshold for intervention suggests a proactive approach to maintaining market diversity and competition, which progressives typically support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 50% of the market share

Economic Progressivism would agree with this answer, as it supports government intervention to prevent monopolies or oligopolies. However, the specific threshold of 50% market share might be seen as too high by some proponents of this ideology, who might prefer a lower threshold. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 50% of the market share

Economic Progressivism would generally agree with preventing mergers that result in excessive market share, as this can lead to monopolistic behavior. However, the specific threshold of 50% might be seen as arbitrary or too lenient by some progressives, who may advocate for lower thresholds or more nuanced criteria. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we already have sufficient anti-trust laws in place to prevent monopolies

While Economic Progressivism believes in the importance of anti-trust laws, it also recognizes that existing laws may not always be sufficient to prevent mega mergers that could lead to monopolies or oligopolies. Therefore, this ideology would neither agree nor disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we already have sufficient anti-trust laws in place to prevent monopolies

While Economic Progressivism recognizes the importance of existing antitrust laws, it often argues that these laws need to be updated or more rigorously enforced to deal with new market dynamics and the digital economy. Progressives may see current laws as insufficient in preventing the formation of monopolies or oligopolies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

This stance is contrary to Economic Progressivism, which advocates for government intervention in preventing large corporations from dominating markets. Economic progressives believe that such dominance can lead to unfair practices, stifle competition, and harm consumers and small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism would strongly disagree with this answer because it believes in the active role of the government in ensuring fair competition in the market. Allowing mega mergers without any restrictions could lead to monopolies or oligopolies, which could harm consumers and small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should not interfere with the free market

Economic Progressivism believes in the active role of the government in ensuring fair competition in the market. This ideology would strongly disagree with the idea of non-interference in the free market, especially in the case of mega mergers that could lead to monopolies or oligopolies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should not interfere with the free market

Economic Progressivism generally supports government intervention in the market to prevent monopolies and ensure fair competition. This ideology believes that without regulation, corporations can become too powerful and harm consumer interests. Historical examples include the Progressive Era reforms in the early 20th century, such as the Sherman Antitrust Act, which was designed to combat monopolies and cartels. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.