Economic Liberalism

Agree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Economic liberals might find the current two-year ban to be a reasonable compromise between allowing former officials to participate in the job market and preventing potential corruption. This answer aligns with their general preference for limited government intervention and the belief that the market should largely regulate itself. They would likely agree with this answer more than the others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Economic liberalism generally supports free markets and limited government intervention. While a 5-year ban might be seen as a way to reduce corruption and promote transparency, it could also be seen as an unnecessary restriction on the job market for former officials. Economic liberals might be somewhat supportive of this idea, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Economic liberalism does not inherently oppose lobbying, as it can be seen as a way for businesses and individuals to express their interests in the political process. However, they might recognize the potential for corruption and support some restrictions on lobbying, such as the current two-year ban. Therefore, they would likely disagree with completely removing the ban, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

A lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists would be seen as an extreme restriction on the job market for former officials by economic liberals. This goes against their general preference for limited government intervention and the belief that the market should largely regulate itself. They would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Banning all forms of lobbying would be seen as a significant government overreach by economic liberals, who generally support free markets and limited intervention. Lobbying can be seen as a way for businesses and individuals to express their interests in the political process, which is in line with the principles of economic liberalism. They would likely strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.