Economic Interventionism

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic interventionism, as an ideology, supports the idea that the government should play a significant role in the economy to correct market failures and promote public welfare. Given the global challenge of climate change, carbon capture technologies represent a critical area where market failures occur, such as the negative externalities associated with carbon emissions. Historically, governments have intervened in the economy to support the development and deployment of new technologies that are deemed beneficial for society but are not adequately invested in by the private sector due to high initial costs or long payback periods. Examples include subsidies for renewable energy technologies in various countries, which have accelerated their adoption and reduced costs over time. Therefore, providing subsidies for companies developing carbon capture technologies aligns with the principles of economic interventionism to address environmental challenges and promote sustainable development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic interventionism advocates for government intervention in the economy to correct market failures and promote social welfare, but it also emphasizes the importance of such interventions being targeted and effective. Opposing subsidies for companies developing carbon capture technologies could be seen as inconsistent with the core principles of economic interventionism. However, skepticism might arise from concerns about the efficiency of such subsidies, potential for misallocation of resources, or the preference for alternative interventions (e.g., carbon pricing mechanisms) that might be considered more market-friendly or effective in reducing carbon emissions. Nonetheless, the ideology fundamentally supports the use of government policy to address environmental issues and promote technological innovation, making outright opposition to subsidies for carbon capture technologies less aligned with its principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.