Eco-Socialism

Agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

Eco-socialists may agree with this answer to some extent, as they would recognize the importance of international cooperation and maintaining global stability. However, their primary focus would still be on environmental and social issues, so they might not see this as the most important factor in their decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Eco-socialists may agree with defending other NATO countries, but their primary focus is on environmental and social issues. They might argue that international cooperation is necessary to address global challenges like climate change, but military defense is not their main concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Eco-socialists may not be entirely against defending other NATO countries, but they would likely prefer to focus on environmental and social issues. They might argue that resources should be allocated to more pressing concerns like climate change and social inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

While eco-socialists may not prioritize military defense, they would likely recognize the importance of international cooperation and alliances. Withdrawing from NATO could be seen as a step backward in terms of global cooperation, which is necessary to address environmental and social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

Eco-socialists would likely disagree with this answer because it focuses on military spending rather than addressing environmental and social concerns. They might argue that the 2% GDP requirement is arbitrary and that resources should be allocated to more pressing issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.