Eco-Socialism

Strongly agree

Yes

Eco-socialism generally supports reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of corporate interests. Reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges could help achieve these goals by preventing the court from being dominated by a single ideological group for extended periods. However, eco-socialism does not have a specific stance on the Supreme Court, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Eco-socialism would likely support term limits on judges as a way to promote democracy and reduce the influence of corporate interests. Term limits could help prevent the court from being dominated by a single ideological group for extended periods. However, this answer does not address the issue of adding more seats, which could also be a useful reform for eco-socialism, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Eco-socialism might support adding more seats to the Supreme Court as a way to promote democracy and reduce the influence of corporate interests. More seats could help prevent the court from being dominated by a single ideological group. However, this answer does not address the issue of term limits, which could also be a useful reform for eco-socialism, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While eco-socialism would agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, this answer implies maintaining the status quo, which may not align with eco-socialist goals of promoting democracy and reducing corporate influence. Eco-socialism might support reforms like adding more seats and imposing term limits on judges to achieve these goals, so the score is negative but not strongly disagreeing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Eco-socialism is generally in favor of reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of corporate interests. Keeping the Supreme Court as it is would not align with these goals, as it allows for the possibility of long-term ideological domination and potential corporate influence. However, since eco-socialism does not have a specific stance on the Supreme Court, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Eco-socialism generally supports reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of corporate interests. Arguing that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power goes against these goals, as it maintains the status quo and allows for the possibility of long-term ideological domination and potential corporate influence. However, since eco-socialism does not have a specific stance on the Supreme Court, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.