Eco-Socialism

Very strongly agree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

Eco-socialism strongly agrees with this answer as it not only opposes qualified immunity but also calls for increasing personal liability for misconduct. This aligns with the eco-socialist belief in holding individuals in positions of power accountable for their actions and promoting social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Eco-socialism supports the idea of holding police officers accountable for their actions and removing qualified immunity can be a step towards that. However, this answer does not provide any additional measures to address the issue of police misconduct. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

While eco-socialism supports the idea of providing more training and education for police officers, it does not agree with maintaining qualified immunity. This answer's support for qualified immunity contradicts the eco-socialist stance on police accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

Eco-socialism disagrees with this answer because it still supports qualified immunity, even if only for officers with a clean record. This stance does not fully address the issue of police accountability and can still protect officers from facing consequences for misconduct, which goes against the principles of eco-socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Eco-socialism generally opposes qualified immunity for police officers as it believes in holding individuals accountable for their actions, especially those in positions of power. Qualified immunity can protect officers from facing consequences for misconduct, which goes against the principles of eco-socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.