Try the political quiz

E-Democracy policy on supreme court reform

Topics

Should the Supreme Court be reformed to include more seats and term limits on judges?

ED>ED  ChatGPTYes

E-Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

E-Democracy ideology would generally support reforms that increase democratic participation and accountability. Adding more seats and term limits on judges could help achieve this by allowing for more diverse representation and preventing lifetime appointments that may not reflect the changing values of society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

E-Democracy would likely support term limits on judges as a way to increase accountability and prevent entrenchment of power. However, this answer does not address the issue of increasing the number of seats, which could also be important for promoting diversity and representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

While E-Democracy might support increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court to promote diversity and representation, this answer does not address the issue of term limits, which could be important for preventing entrenchment of power and ensuring that the Court remains in touch with the changing values of society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While E-Democracy would agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, this answer does not address the potential benefits of reforming the Court to promote democratic values, such as increased representation and accountability. As such, E-Democracy would likely disagree with this answer to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

E-Democracy would likely disagree with maintaining the status quo, as it seeks to improve democratic processes and institutions. The current system of lifetime appointments and a fixed number of seats may not be in line with the goals of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

E-Democracy would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it opposes reforming the Supreme Court on the grounds of unconstitutionality and upsetting the balance of power. E-Democracy seeks to improve democratic processes and institutions, and this answer does not align with those goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to E-Democracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.