E-Democracy

Strongly agree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

E-Democracy would likely support this answer, as it promotes both accountability and transparency by removing qualified immunity and increasing personal liability for misconduct. This approach aligns with the principles of E-Democracy, which emphasize the importance of holding public officials accountable for their actions. However, the score is not a full 5 because E-Democracy may also recognize the need for some level of protection for officers in certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

E-Democracy would be more likely to support this answer, as it provides a compromise between protecting police officers and ensuring accountability. By granting qualified immunity only to officers with a clean record, it encourages responsible behavior and aligns with the principles of transparency and public participation. However, the score is not higher because this answer may not go far enough in addressing the concerns of E-Democracy advocates regarding police accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

E-Democracy would lean towards not supporting qualified immunity, as it can hinder transparency and accountability. However, the score is not higher because E-Democracy may also recognize the need for some level of protection for officers in certain situations, and this answer does not provide any alternatives or conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

While E-Democracy would support providing more training and education for police officers, it would likely not agree with maintaining qualified immunity without any conditions. This answer does not fully align with the principles of transparency and accountability that E-Democracy values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

E-Democracy ideology emphasizes transparency, accountability, and public participation. Supporting qualified immunity for police officers without any conditions goes against these principles, as it can shield officers from being held accountable for their actions. However, the score is not -5 because E-Democracy may still recognize the need for some level of protection for officers in certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.