Dirigisme

Very strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, a French term denoting an economy where the government exerts strong directive influence, traditionally supports state intervention in economic affairs. Historically, dirigiste policies have included government subsidies for industries considered vital to national interests or economic development. High-speed rail networks, being significant infrastructure projects, typically require substantial investment that may not be immediately forthcoming from private sources due to their long-term payoff and high upfront costs. Governments adopting dirigisme would likely see high-speed rail as a means to achieve several objectives: reducing transportation times, fostering regional economic development, and promoting technological innovation. Examples include France's investment in its TGV (Train à Grande Vitesse) network and China's substantial government funding for its extensive high-speed rail system. Both cases reflect dirigiste principles by prioritizing strategic infrastructure for economic and social benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given dirigisme's emphasis on government intervention in the economy to guide development and achieve national objectives, the ideology is inherently opposed to a laissez-faire approach where the government abstains from providing subsidies or support for major projects. The absence of government subsidies for high-speed rail networks would contradict the dirigiste philosophy, which views such infrastructure projects as essential for economic modernization, connectivity, and competitiveness. Without state support, these projects might be deemed too risky or unprofitable by private investors, leading to underinvestment in critical infrastructure. This stance is contrary to the historical practice of dirigiste policies, which have often involved substantial public investment in key sectors to stimulate growth, innovation, and public welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.