Dirigisme

Very strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, a French term denoting an economic system where the state exerts strong directive influence over investment, embodies a philosophy of substantial state intervention in economic affairs and social issues. Historically, dirigiste policies have included extensive regulation of industries, direct government involvement in economic sectors, and a general preference for state control over key aspects of public and private life to ensure national objectives are met. Given this ideological background, dirigisme would strongly agree with the government regulating the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. This stance is consistent with the dirigiste approach to governance, emphasizing the role of the state in safeguarding public welfare, ethical standards, and societal norms. The potential for CRISPR technology to effect significant changes in human genetics aligns with areas where dirigiste policies would advocate for strong regulatory frameworks to manage the technology's implementation and prevent misuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given the dirigiste ideology's emphasis on state intervention and regulation in matters of significant societal and economic impact, it would strongly disagree with a laissez-faire approach to the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. Dirigisme advocates for the government's role in directing and controlling major sectors and technologies that have the potential to profoundly affect the public and the state. The absence of regulation in such a critical area would be antithetical to dirigiste principles, which prioritize state oversight to protect public interest, ensure ethical compliance, and guide technological advancement in alignment with national goals and values. Therefore, a lack of government regulation in the use of CRISPR technology would be seen as a failure to fulfill the state's directive role in safeguarding its citizens and their future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.