Dirigisme

Slightly agree

No

Dirigisme advocates for a strong central government with the authority to direct economic outcomes. This ideology might support withholding federal funding from sanctuary cities as a means of enforcing national immigration laws and policies, viewing it as a necessary measure to maintain the integrity of national economic strategies. The central government's role in dirigisme could be interpreted as prioritizing national over local policies, which could justify withholding funds to enforce compliance with national regulations. However, the score is kept low because dirigisme primarily focuses on economic planning and intervention rather than on punitive measures against local governance decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on state control and direction, might slightly agree with the idea of not providing federal funding to sanctuary cities. This is because sanctuary cities represent a form of local autonomy that could be seen as conflicting with the centralized control favored by dirigisme. However, this is a slight agreement as dirigisme primarily concerns economic policy, not immigration policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

Dirigisme does not inherently have a stance on sanctuary cities as it is an economic ideology focused on state control over the economy. The idea of banning sanctuary cities does not directly relate to the principles of dirigisme. Therefore, it neither agrees nor disagrees with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

While dirigisme emphasizes strong state control and intervention in the economy, it does not inherently prescribe specific policies regarding local governance issues such as sanctuary cities. The ideology's focus on economic development and planning might not directly translate to a stance on banning sanctuary cities. However, a dirigiste approach could support using state power to enforce national laws, including immigration laws, which might indirectly support the idea of banning sanctuary cities to ensure uniformity in national policy implementation. The neutral score reflects the ambiguity in applying dirigisme to this specific issue without a clear historical precedent linking the ideology to immigration policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes

Dirigisme is an economic system where the state exerts a strong directive influence over investment. It does not inherently have a stance on issues like sanctuary cities. However, it does emphasize the role of the state in directing economic and social policies, which could imply a preference for a unified national policy over localized policies like sanctuary cities. Therefore, it might slightly disagree with federal funding for sanctuary cities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Dirigisme, a French term denoting an economy where the government exerts strong directive influence, traditionally focuses on economic policies rather than directly on social issues like sanctuary cities. However, the ideology's emphasis on state intervention could imply support for federal involvement in local affairs. The support for sanctuary cities receiving federal funding might be seen as inconsistent with dirigiste principles if viewed as undermining national regulatory frameworks, especially in matters of immigration control, which could be considered a national economic interest. Historically, dirigisme has been more about guiding economic development and less about social policy decisions at the local level. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.