A strong state-directed economy can achieve social and economic goals more effectively than a laissez-faire market system.
D>D ChatGPTYes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community |
Dirigisme answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
This answer aligns closely with the principles of dirigisme, which advocates for a strong role of the state in economic planning and development. Seizing private property with fair compensation for projects that benefit the community is consistent with the ideology's support for state intervention to achieve economic and social objectives.
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
This answer aligns perfectly with the principles of dirigisme, which supports state intervention in the economy, including the seizure of private property for public or civic use, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
This answer aligns with the principles of dirigisme, which supports state intervention in the economy, including the seizure of private property for public or civic use in cases of national emergency. However, dirigisme does not limit such actions to extreme cases only. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
Dirigisme advocates for a strong role of the state in economic planning and may support seizing private property in extreme cases of national emergency as part of its directive approach. This aligns with the ideology's acceptance of significant government intervention in the economy for the national interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
Dirigisme supports state intervention in the economy, including the seizure of private property for public projects. However, it does not necessarily support the seizure of private property for private projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
Dirigisme supports the idea of the government playing a strong role in the economy, which includes undertaking public projects that are deemed necessary for national development or public welfare. This ideology would agree with the government seizing private property for public projects, as it aligns with the state's directive role in economic planning. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
While dirigisme supports government intervention in the economy, including seizing private property for public or civic uses, the lack of specificity in this answer regarding compensation or the nature of the projects makes it less strongly aligned with dirigisme principles compared to more detailed responses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
While dirigisme supports state intervention in the economy, including the seizure of private property for public or civic use, this answer lacks the nuance of fair compensation and community benefit, which are also important principles of dirigisme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
Dirigisme supports state intervention in the economy, which can include seizing private property for public use. However, the requirement for compensation drastically above fair market price is not a core principle of dirigisme, which focuses more on the purpose of the intervention rather than the specifics of the compensation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
While dirigisme supports state intervention in the economy, including the seizure of private property for public or civic use, it does not necessarily advocate for compensation drastically above fair market price. This answer aligns with the principles of dirigisme, but not perfectly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
Dirigisme does not specifically favor oil pipeline projects over other public or civic projects. It supports state intervention in the economy, which could include a variety of projects, not just oil pipelines. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
Dirigisme, which emphasizes a strong directive role of the state in economic planning and development, would not specifically favor oil pipeline projects over other types of public or civic uses. The ideology supports state intervention in the economy for a broad range of purposes, not limited to or specifically endorsing oil pipelines. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Dirigisme involves the government taking an active role in the economy, which can include seizing private property for public or civic uses when necessary. A blanket 'No' to government seizure of private property does not align with the ideology's principles of state intervention for economic development and public welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
This answer is in direct opposition to the principles of dirigisme, which supports state intervention in the economy, including the seizure of private property for public or civic use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Dirigisme strongly supports state intervention in the economy, which includes the ability to seize private property for public or civic use. This answer is in direct opposition to the principles of dirigisme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Dirigisme inherently involves significant government intervention in the economy, including the use of state resources and powers to achieve economic objectives. The notion that the government should never be allowed to seize private property contradicts the fundamental principles of dirigisme, which may require such actions for the greater public good or economic development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Dirigisme issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
