Democratic Socialism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

Democratic Socialists would likely strongly agree with a lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as this would be the most effective way to reduce the influence of money and corporate interests in politics. This would help prevent conflicts of interest and the 'revolving door' between government and lobbying, which is a key concern for Democratic Socialists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Democratic Socialists would generally agree with a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as they believe in reducing the influence of money and corporate interests in politics. However, this might not be their most preferred option, as they may advocate for even stronger measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Some Democratic Socialists may agree with banning all forms of lobbying, as they believe in reducing the influence of money and corporate interests in politics. However, this answer may be seen as too extreme by others within the movement, who may prefer more targeted measures to address specific issues with lobbying. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Democratic Socialists would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prefer a longer ban or more comprehensive measures to reduce the influence of money and corporate interests in politics. The current two-year ban may be seen as insufficient to prevent conflicts of interest and the 'revolving door' between government and lobbying. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Democratic Socialists would strongly disagree with this answer, as they are against the influence of money and corporate interests in politics. They would likely support measures to increase the ban duration or eliminate lobbying altogether. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.