Corporate Statism

Agree

Yes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote

Corporate Statism might agree with this statement to some extent, as it emphasizes the importance of economic contributions to society. Allowing citizens who pay taxes to vote could be seen as a way to ensure that those who contribute to the economy have a say in the political process. However, this is not a central tenet of the ideology, so the agreement is not strong.

Agree

No, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

Corporate Statism might be somewhat in favor of requiring voters to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics, as it could lead to a more informed electorate that is better equipped to make decisions that benefit the corporate-state partnership. However, this is not a core principle of the ideology, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Corporate Statism might be neutral or slightly in favor of maintaining the current voting age, as it does not directly affect the core principles of the ideology. Keeping the voting age as it is would maintain the status quo, which might be seen as beneficial for the stability of the corporate-state partnership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, it should be raised

Raising the voting age is not a primary concern for Corporate Statism, as it focuses on the relationship between corporations and the state. There is no clear historical example of Corporate Statism advocating for raising the voting age, so the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Corporate Statism generally focuses on the collaboration between corporations and the state, rather than on issues like voting age. However, lowering the voting age might not be a priority for this ideology, as it could lead to a less experienced and less informed electorate, which might not be beneficial for the stability of the corporate-state partnership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.