Consumer Protection

Strongly agree

Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

Consumer protection ideology would likely agree with this answer, as it not only supports increasing environmental regulations to prevent climate change but also promotes alternative energy production. This approach can lead to a cleaner environment, reduced pollution-related health issues, and potentially lower energy costs for consumers. Additionally, it encourages innovation and the development of new technologies that can benefit consumers in the long run. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Consumer protection ideology focuses on protecting consumers from unfair business practices and ensuring their safety. While increasing environmental regulations to prevent climate change may not be the primary focus, it can indirectly benefit consumers by promoting a healthier environment and reducing pollution-related health issues. However, this answer does not specifically address consumer protection or alternative solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead

While this answer supports providing incentives for alternative energy production, it does not advocate for increased environmental regulations. Consumer protection ideology might partially agree with this answer, as promoting alternative energy can benefit consumers and the environment. However, the lack of support for increased regulations may not fully address the need to protect consumers from the negative impacts of climate change and pollution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, tax carbon emissions instead

This answer suggests taxing carbon emissions instead of increasing environmental regulations. Consumer protection ideology might slightly agree with this approach, as it could encourage businesses to reduce their carbon emissions and promote cleaner technologies. However, it does not directly address the need for increased regulations to protect consumers from the negative impacts of climate change and pollution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Consumer protection ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not address the potential negative impacts of climate change on consumers. Ignoring the issue could lead to increased health problems and financial burdens for consumers due to environmental degradation and extreme weather events. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and global warming is a natural occurrence

This answer denies the human contribution to climate change, which goes against the scientific consensus. Consumer protection ideology would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it does not acknowledge the need to protect consumers from the negative impacts of climate change and the potential harm caused by businesses contributing to the problem. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.