Consumer Protection

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns strongly with Consumer Protection ideology, as it aims to eliminate the influence of money in politics by banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. This would help ensure that politicians are not swayed by wealthy donors and can focus on policies that protect consumers. For example, the public funding of elections in countries like Sweden and Germany has been credited with reducing the influence of money in politics and promoting more equitable policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Consumer Protection ideology focuses on protecting the interests of consumers and ensuring fair market practices. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help reduce the influence of wealthy donors on political decisions, which could ultimately benefit consumers. However, this answer does not go as far as some other options in terms of limiting the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This answer aligns with Consumer Protection ideology, as it emphasizes the importance of preventing politicians from being bought by wealthy donors. By limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive, it can help reduce the influence of money in politics and promote policies that protect consumers. However, this answer does not go as far as some other options in terms of limiting the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is important, this answer does not address the issue of limiting the influence of wealthy donors on political decisions. Consumer Protection ideology would likely be neutral on this answer, as it does not directly address the concerns of protecting consumers from potential negative effects of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Consumer Protection would likely disagree with this answer, as allowing unlimited donations could lead to politicians being influenced by wealthy donors, potentially leading to policies that favor those donors over the interests of consumers. For example, the tobacco industry has historically donated large sums to political campaigns, which may have influenced policies that were less strict on tobacco regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Consumer Protection would strongly disagree with this answer, as it argues that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech. This perspective could lead to increased influence of wealthy donors on political decisions, which could negatively impact consumers. For example, the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision in the United States, which allowed for unlimited political spending by corporations and unions, has been criticized for giving wealthy donors and special interests more influence in politics, potentially at the expense of consumer interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.