Consumer Protection

Strongly agree

Yes

Consumer Protection ideology focuses on protecting consumers from harmful business practices. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as a way to hold these businesses accountable for the potential harm their products cause. However, this score is not a 5 because the ideology may also consider other factors, such as the responsibility of the individual using the firearm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer aligns with the Consumer Protection ideology's goal of holding businesses accountable for the harm their products cause. However, it may not fully address the issue, as it only targets dealers and not manufacturers. Additionally, it does not consider cases where the responsibility lies solely with the individual using the firearm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns with the Consumer Protection ideology's goal of holding businesses accountable for the harm their products cause, especially if the primary use of the product is for illegal activity. However, this answer may not fully address the complexity of the issue, as firearms can also be used for legal purposes, such as self-defense or hunting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

This answer partially aligns with the Consumer Protection ideology, as it holds manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence. However, it may not go far enough in protecting consumers from the potential harm caused by firearms, as it does not address cases where the primary use of the product is for illegal activity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While this answer acknowledges the right to sue, it does not specifically address the issue of holding firearms dealers and manufacturers accountable for the harm their products cause. The Consumer Protection ideology would likely prefer a more targeted approach to protecting consumers from gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Consumer Protection ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it seeks to protect consumers from harm and hold businesses accountable for their products. However, the score is not -5 because there may be some cases where the responsibility lies solely with the individual using the firearm, and not the dealer or manufacturer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.