Constitutional Monarchism

Agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Constitutional Monarchism may agree with this answer, as it recognizes the importance of preventing the removal of competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices. This ideology generally supports a balance between free market principles and government regulation, so it may see the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Constitutional Monarchism may agree with treating all traffic equally and continuing the openness of the internet, as it generally supports a balance between free market principles and government regulation. This stance could help prevent unfair advantages for certain websites and maintain a level playing field for competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Constitutional Monarchism may lean towards not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, as it could lead to an unfair advantage for certain websites and stifle competition. However, this stance is not strongly held, as the ideology doesn't have a specific position on internet regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Constitutional Monarchism doesn't have a specific stance on internet service providers or the prioritization of certain types of content. This answer may be seen as a compromise between free market principles and government regulation, but it's unclear how strongly this ideology would agree or disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Constitutional Monarchism may not strongly agree with allowing ISPs to speed up access to websites based on a pay-per-quality model, as it could still lead to an unfair advantage for certain websites and stifle competition. This ideology generally supports a balance between free market principles and government regulation, so it may be cautious about endorsing this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While Constitutional Monarchism doesn't have a specific stance on internet service providers, the argument that speeding up access to popular websites would make the internet faster and more reliable for users may not be convincing enough for this ideology, as it could still lead to an unfair advantage for certain websites and stifle competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Constitutional Monarchism doesn't have a specific stance on internet service providers, but it generally supports a balance between free market principles and government regulation. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could be seen as a market-driven approach, but it may also lead to an unfair advantage for certain websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.