Try the political quiz

Conspiracism policy on medicaid

Topics

Should the federal government increase funding of health care for low income individuals (Medicaid)?

C>C  ChatGPTNo, and abolish Medicaid

Conspiracism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would remove government involvement in healthcare, which conspiracists may see as a positive step towards limiting government control over citizens. This answer aligns with their general distrust of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Conspiracists often distrust the government and may see social programs as a way for the government to exert control over citizens. They may prefer private or community-based solutions to social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Conspiracists often distrust the government and may believe that increased funding for healthcare could lead to more control over citizens. They may prefer alternative solutions or private healthcare options. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Conspiracists may prefer states to have more control over their own policies, as it could limit the power of the federal government. However, this answer still involves some level of government involvement in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

While this answer limits government involvement in healthcare, it still acknowledges the need for some support for specific groups. Conspiracists may be somewhat in favor of this, but still prefer less government involvement overall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

This answer is neutral for conspiracists, as it involves both government involvement in healthcare and a focus on specific groups. Some may see the benefit of helping the elderly and disabled, while others may still prefer less government involvement overall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Conspiracists may be skeptical of government involvement in healthcare, fearing that it could lead to more control over individuals. However, some may see the benefit of helping low-income individuals, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

A single-payer healthcare system would involve even more government control, which conspiracists generally oppose. They may see this as a step towards a more authoritarian government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Conspiracism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.