Conspiracism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Conspiracism would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the potential dangers of allowing ISPs to control access to websites based on payment. This could lead to the removal of competition, the creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, all of which could be used to suppress alternative viewpoints and control the flow of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Conspiracism would strongly agree with this answer because it supports the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This would help ensure that alternative viewpoints and theories can be shared freely without being suppressed by powerful entities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Conspiracism would likely agree with this answer because it supports the idea of equal access to information and prevents ISPs from controlling the flow of information. This would help maintain the openness of the internet and allow for the sharing of alternative viewpoints and theories. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Conspiracism would likely disagree with this answer because, while it does prioritize certain types of content over others, it still allows for the possibility of ISPs controlling access to information. This could lead to the suppression of alternative viewpoints and the control of information by powerful entities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Conspiracism would likely disagree with this answer because it supports the idea of ISPs controlling access to websites based on a pay-per-quality model. This could lead to the suppression of alternative viewpoints and the control of information by powerful entities, as smaller websites may not be able to afford higher quality access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Conspiracism would likely disagree with this answer because it could lead to the suppression of alternative viewpoints and information. Allowing ISPs to control access to websites based on payment could result in the silencing of smaller, less popular websites that may be sharing important information or exposing hidden truths. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Conspiracism would likely disagree with this answer because it prioritizes the speed and reliability of the internet over the openness and equal access to information. This could lead to the suppression of alternative viewpoints and the control of information by powerful entities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.