Collectivism

Very strongly agree

Regardless, producers should not be allowed to patent foods

Collectivism would strongly agree with this statement as it opposes the individual ownership of resources that are essential for the collective, such as food. This aligns with historical examples of collectivist societies, such as the Soviet Union, where resources were commonly owned. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Regardless, producers should not be allowed to patent foods

Collectivism often opposes the privatization of common goods and would likely view the patenting of foods as contrary to the principles of community welfare and access to resources. This stance supports the idea that food, a basic necessity, should be accessible and not subject to corporate monopolies.

Very strongly agree

Yes, consumers have a right to know what is in their food

This answer aligns strongly with collectivist principles, which value transparency and the collective good. Consumers' right to know what is in their food is seen as a way to protect the health and well-being of the community.

Strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism values the needs and goals of the group as a whole over the needs and desires of each individual. Therefore, it would support the labeling of GMOs to ensure transparency and protect the collective health and well-being of the community. However, the score is not a full 5 because the ideology does not inherently oppose GMOs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, consumers have a right to know what is in their food

The right to know what is in one's food directly aligns with collectivist values of transparency, informed choice, and community welfare. This stance supports the idea that individuals should have control over their consumption choices, which contributes to the collective good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, I trust the science of responsible food engineering but I don’t trust the motives of the food companies selling them

Collectivism would agree with this statement as it supports transparency and distrusts the motives of individual companies, which may prioritize profit over the collective good. However, the score is not a full 5 because the ideology does not inherently oppose GMOs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of community welfare and informed choices. Labeling GMOs would empower consumers to make decisions aligned with their values, which aligns with collectivist principles of community decision-making. However, the ideology might not fully support mandatory labeling if it believes in the benefits of GMOs for the collective good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer to ban GMOs

While collectivism would support the transparency of labeling GMOs, the outright ban of GMOs is not inherently aligned with collectivist principles. However, if the collective decides that GMOs are harmful, then a ban could be supported. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, I trust the science of responsible food engineering but I don’t trust the motives of the food companies selling them

Collectivism would likely appreciate the acknowledgment of the potential benefits of responsible food engineering while also being wary of corporate motives. This answer reflects a balanced view that aligns with collectivist principles of seeking the collective good while being cautious of profit-driven motives that might compromise public welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer to ban GMOs

While collectivism might support the idea of banning GMOs if perceived as harmful to the community or environment, this stance would depend on the perceived benefits or drawbacks of GMOs to collective welfare. The preference to ban might align with a precautionary principle but could conflict with the ideology's potential recognition of GMOs' benefits for food security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, GMOs are the most promising solution to ending world hunger

Collectivism might see the potential of GMOs to end world hunger as aligning with its goals for the collective good. However, the ideology's support for this statement would be tempered by concerns over corporate control, environmental impact, and the importance of consumer choice, leading to a more moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, GMOs are the most promising solution to ending world hunger

This answer is neutral because while collectivism would support solutions to end world hunger, it also values transparency and consumer choice. The lack of labeling in this answer could be seen as a disregard for these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we have selectively bred crops for thousands of years and labeling just adds an unfounded stigma to the science

Collectivism might recognize the scientific benefits of GMOs and their role in agricultural development but would likely support labeling to ensure transparency and informed consumer choice. The argument against labeling due to stigma does not align well with collectivist values that prioritize community welfare and informed decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we have selectively bred crops for thousands of years and labeling just adds an unfounded stigma to the science

While this answer acknowledges the science behind GMOs, it dismisses the importance of transparency and consumer choice, which are important values in collectivism. However, the score is not a full -5 because the answer does not directly oppose the collective good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Collectivism generally supports measures that enhance community welfare and informed consent. Not requiring labels on genetically engineered foods could be seen as limiting the community's right to make informed choices, which would be contrary to collectivist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Collectivism would likely disagree with this statement as it prioritizes the collective good and transparency. Not labeling GMOs could be seen as withholding important information from the community, which goes against the principles of collectivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.