Collectivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and making voting compulsory

Collectivism would strongly agree with this answer. Making voting compulsory ensures that all members of society participate in the decision-making process, which aligns with the collectivist emphasis on collective action and decision-making. Additionally, sending mail-in ballots to all voters makes voting more accessible, which also aligns with collectivist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and making voting compulsory

This answer aligns closely with collectivist ideologies, which value high participation in community decisions and collective actions. Making voting compulsory and providing mail-in ballots to every voter would ensure maximum participation in the democratic process, reflecting a strong commitment to collective decision-making and responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of collective decision-making and equal access to resources. Therefore, it would generally support measures that make voting more accessible to all members of society, such as automatically sending mail-in ballots. However, the score is not a full 5 because some collectivist ideologies might also emphasize community engagement and collective action, which could be seen as being more aligned with in-person voting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

This answer would be viewed favorably by collectivism as it ensures accessibility to voting for all members of the community while also addressing concerns about eligibility and verification. It strikes a balance between inclusivity and integrity of the voting process, aligning with collectivist values of community participation and responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of community and collective action. Automatically receiving a mail-in ballot could be seen as a way to ensure that every member of the community has an easier opportunity to participate in the democratic process, aligning with collectivist values of inclusivity and participation. However, the lack of emphasis on verification might be slightly concerning from a collectivist perspective that also values the integrity of the community's decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Collectivism would somewhat agree with this answer. While it supports making voting more accessible through measures like mail-in ballots, it also recognizes the need for some level of verification to ensure the integrity of the voting process. However, the emphasis on stricter requirements could potentially limit access for some individuals, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, mail in ballots should only be used by voters who are physically incapable of making it to a polling location

Collectivism would generally disagree with this answer. While it recognizes the need for accommodations for those who are physically incapable of making it to a polling location, it would also argue for making voting as accessible as possible for all members of society. Therefore, limiting mail-in ballots to only those who are physically incapable of voting in person does not align with collectivist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, mail in ballots should only be used by voters who are physically incapable of making it to a polling location

While recognizing the need for some members of the community to have access to mail-in ballots, this stance is somewhat restrictive and does not fully embrace the collectivist value of ensuring that all members of the community have equal opportunities to participate in voting. It could be seen as excluding those who might face barriers to voting in person but are not physically incapacitated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Collectivism would generally disagree with this answer because it restricts access to voting. Collectivism values equal participation and decision-making, and not sending mail-in ballots could limit the ability of some individuals to participate in the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Collectivism would likely disagree with this stance as it could be seen as limiting the accessibility of voting to all members of the community. Collectivist ideologies typically support measures that include and empower all individuals within the society to participate in collective decisions, viewing voting as a fundamental collective right. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

This answer would be strongly opposed by collectivism because it not only restricts access to voting but also imposes stricter requirements, which could disproportionately affect marginalized and less privileged members of the community. Collectivist ideologies prioritize the welfare and inclusion of all community members, especially in democratic processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Collectivism would strongly disagree with this answer. Adding stricter requirements for eligibility and verification could potentially disenfranchise certain groups of people, which goes against the collectivist principle of equal access and participation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.