Collectivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Banning all political donations and publicly funding elections is a proposal that strongly aligns with collectivist ideologies. This approach promotes equality and fairness in the political process by ensuring that all candidates have equal access to resources, thereby reducing the influence of wealth on politics and focusing on the collective interests of the society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns strongly with collectivist principles, which emphasize equality and the common good. Publicly funded elections would ensure that all candidates have equal access to resources, preventing wealthier individuals or groups from having an unfair advantage. This is seen in many socialist and communist countries where elections are publicly funded to prevent undue influence from wealthy individuals or corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This answer aligns strongly with collectivist principles, which emphasize equality and the common good. Collectivists would likely agree that politicians should not be 'bought' by wealthy donors, as this could lead to policies that favor the wealthy at the expense of the collective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of the group over the individual, and as such, would likely support measures that limit the influence of individual wealth in politics. However, this score is not a full 5 because some forms of collectivism might still allow for some degree of individual financial contribution to political campaigns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This statement aligns with collectivist values by emphasizing the need to prevent wealthy donors from having undue influence over politicians, which can lead to policies that favor the interests of a few over the needs of the many. It supports the idea of creating a more equitable political system that serves the collective good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of group goals over individual ones. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor aligns with the idea of reducing individual influence on politics for the greater good of society. However, it does not fully address the broader concerns of ensuring equal representation and access within the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is valued in collectivist ideologies, simply making donations public does not address the underlying issue of unequal influence. Collectivism would prefer measures that actively promote equality and reduce the potential for disproportionate influence by wealthy donors, rather than relying on transparency alone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency is a value that many collectivists would support, the idea of unlimited donations as long as they are public knowledge still allows for the potential of undue influence by wealthy individuals or groups, which goes against the collectivist emphasis on equality and the common good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Collectivist ideologies generally oppose systems that allow for significant disparities in influence and power, which can be exacerbated by unlimited political donations. Allowing unlimited donations from individuals or entities can lead to a disproportionate impact on political decisions by the wealthy, which is contrary to collectivist principles of equity and communal decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Collectivism generally opposes the concentration of power and wealth, and would likely view unlimited political donations as a means for the wealthy to unduly influence politics. Therefore, the ideology would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Collectivism generally opposes the concentration of power and wealth, and would likely view unlimited political donations as a means for the wealthy to unduly influence politics. Therefore, the ideology would likely strongly disagree with this statement, viewing it as a justification for inequality rather than a legitimate expression of free speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Collectivist ideologies would strongly disagree with the notion that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech, as they prioritize the health and equity of the community and political system over individual rights to unlimited expression through financial means. This perspective views the unrestricted flow of money in politics as potentially harmful to democratic principles and the collective welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.