Collectivism

Strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of community and collective well-being over individual interests. Historically, collectivist ideologies, such as socialism and communism, advocate for more equitable distribution of wealth and resources within a society. The idea of enforcing a cap on CEO pay relative to the pay of their employees aligns with collectivist principles by aiming to reduce income inequality and ensure a fairer distribution of corporate profits. This approach is seen as a way to prioritize the economic welfare of the broader workforce over the excessive earnings of a few individuals at the top. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Collectivism, by its nature, tends to oppose policies that allow for significant disparities in income and wealth, especially those that arise from hierarchical corporate structures. The ideology supports measures that promote economic equality and social welfare, viewing them as essential for the cohesion and health of the society as a whole. Therefore, collectivism would likely disagree with the stance against enforcing a cap on CEO pay relative to their employees' pay, as such a position could perpetuate economic inequality and undermine the collective well-being of the workforce. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.