Legalizing marijuana will lead to reduced crime rates, increased tax revenue, and improved public health.
CL>CL ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Cannabis Legalisation answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Cannabis Legalisation ideology would likely agree with this answer because gerrymandering can create an unfair advantage for the party in power, which could negatively impact the progress of cannabis legalization policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Cannabis Legalisation ideology may not have a strong stance on redistricting, but it generally supports fair representation and equal opportunities for all political parties. An independent, non-partisan commission could help achieve that. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Cannabis Legalisation ideology may not have a strong stance on this specific redistricting system, but it could support a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system as it promotes fair representation and equal opportunities for all political parties, which could benefit the progress of cannabis legalization policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Cannabis Legalisation ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it could lead to gerrymandering and unfair representation, which could hinder the progress of cannabis legalization policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Cannabis Legalisation ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it implies that there is no better alternative to the current system, which may not be true. An independent, non-partisan commission or a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could be better alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Cannabis Legalisation ideology would strongly disagree with this answer because gerrymandering can lead to unfair representation and hinder the progress of cannabis legalization policies. It is not in the best interest of the ideology to support gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Cannabis Legalisation issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
