Embracing diverse perspectives and fostering inclusivity within a political party will lead to a stronger, more unified organization capable of achieving common goals.
BT>BT ChatGPTYes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power |
Big Tent answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power
The Big Tent ideology is likely to agree with this statement, as it emphasizes the importance of maintaining global stability and the balance of power. Refusing to defend other NATO countries could lead to increased conflict and instability, which goes against the cooperative principles of the Big Tent. However, the score is not a full 5 because some factions within the Big Tent may argue for more stringent defense spending requirements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Big Tent ideology generally supports cooperation and unity among diverse groups. Defending NATO countries with low military budgets aligns with this principle of collaboration. However, the score is not a full 5 because some factions within the Big Tent may argue for more stringent defense spending requirements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense
While the Big Tent ideology generally supports cooperation, some factions may argue for more accountability and responsibility from NATO members. Setting a 2% GDP military spending requirement could be seen as a way to ensure that all members are contributing fairly to the alliance. However, this stance could also lead to division and weaken the alliance, which is why the score is not strongly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Big Tent ideology is less likely to support refusing to defend NATO countries with low military budgets, as it could lead to division and weaken the alliance. However, some factions within the Big Tent may argue for more accountability and responsibility from NATO members, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and we should withdraw from NATO
Withdrawing from NATO would be a significant departure from the cooperative and collaborative principles of the Big Tent ideology. NATO has been a cornerstone of international security since its inception in 1949, and withdrawing would likely lead to increased global instability. However, some factions within the Big Tent may be more isolationist, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Big Tent issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
