Anti-War

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns strongly with anti-war ideology, as it not only limits the influence of wealthy donors and corporations but also promotes public funding of elections. This can help ensure that candidates are not beholden to special interests that may promote war or military actions, and instead focus on the needs and desires of the general public, which may be more inclined towards peace and diplomacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-war ideology would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, as it can help reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations that may have vested interests in promoting war or military actions. However, this answer does not go as far as some anti-war advocates might prefer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Anti-war ideology would generally agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of limiting the influence of wealthy donors who may have vested interests in promoting war or military actions. However, this answer does not go as far as some anti-war advocates might prefer, such as calling for public funding of elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is important, anti-war ideology would likely still disagree with this answer, as it does not address the issue of limiting the influence of wealthy donors and corporations that may have vested interests in promoting war or military actions. Simply making donations public knowledge does not necessarily reduce their influence on candidates and policy decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-war ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as allowing unlimited donations can lead to increased influence of wealthy donors and corporations that may have vested interests in promoting war or military actions. This could undermine the anti-war movement's goals of promoting peace and diplomacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Anti-war ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it frames the issue as a matter of free speech rather than addressing the potential influence of wealthy donors and corporations that may have vested interests in promoting war or military actions. By prioritizing free speech over limiting the influence of money in politics, this answer could undermine the goals of the anti-war movement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.