Anti-Environmentalism

Strongly agree

No

Anti-environmentalists would likely agree with this answer, as they tend to support limited government intervention and regulation. They would argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This stance is consistent with their opposition to environmental regulations that they believe unfairly burden businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Anti-environmentalists might somewhat agree with this answer, as it suggests that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence, rather than for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This stance is more in line with their preference for limited government intervention and regulation, although they might still prefer no liability at all for the firearms industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Anti-environmentalists might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it allows for victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. While they might appreciate the aspect of the losing party paying all legal fees, they would likely still prefer to limit the potential for lawsuits against the firearms industry, as it could lead to increased regulation and restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Anti-environmentalists would likely disagree with this answer, as it allows for victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers. This stance could lead to increased regulation and restrictions on the firearms industry, which is something anti-environmentalists generally oppose. They would likely prefer that dealers not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Anti-environmentalism is primarily focused on opposing environmental regulations and policies. However, it often aligns with conservative ideologies that support gun rights and limited government intervention. Therefore, allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be opposed by anti-environmentalists, as it could lead to increased regulation and restrictions on the firearms industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Anti-environmentalists would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies that firearms dealers and manufacturers should be held liable for illegal activities involving their products. This stance would likely be seen as an overreach of government regulation and an infringement on the rights of businesses, which is something anti-environmentalists generally oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.