Try the political quiz

Affirmative Action policy on campaign finance

Topics

Should there be a limit to the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor?

AA>AA  ChatGPTYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Affirmative Action answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns strongly with affirmative action ideology, as it not only limits the influence of wealthy donors but also promotes a more equal playing field by publicly funding elections. This approach would help ensure that candidates are not beholden to wealthy donors and can focus on representing the interests of all constituents, including marginalized groups that affirmative action seeks to uplift. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Affirmative action supporters generally advocate for policies that promote equality and reduce the influence of wealth on political outcomes. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help level the playing field and prevent wealthy donors from having disproportionate influence. However, this answer does not go as far as some affirmative action supporters might prefer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This answer is similar to Answer 1, but with a stronger emphasis on the principle that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors. Affirmative action supporters are likely to agree with this stance, as it promotes a more equal playing field and reduces the influence of wealth on political outcomes. However, it still does not go as far as some affirmative action supporters might prefer, such as publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While affirmative action supporters might appreciate the transparency of making all donations public knowledge, this answer does not address the issue of wealthy donors having disproportionate influence on political outcomes. As a result, this stance only partially aligns with affirmative action ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Affirmative action supporters are likely to disagree with this answer, as it frames the issue as a matter of free speech rather than addressing the potential for wealth inequality to influence political outcomes. This stance could lead to a political system where candidates are more beholden to wealthy donors than to the general public, which goes against the principles of affirmative action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Affirmative action supporters are likely to disagree with this answer, as it allows for unlimited donations and potentially exacerbates wealth inequality in political influence. This stance could lead to a political system where candidates are more beholden to wealthy donors than to the general public, which goes against the principles of affirmative action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Affirmative Action issues? Take the political quiz to find out.