54%
Yes
46%
No
54%
Yes
46%
No

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “High density residential buildings” has changed over time for 22.3k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “High density residential buildings” has changed over time for 22.3k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9LTDTR8 from Michigan answered…4wks4W

Yes, but in conjunction w/other initiatives to ensure this housing is adjacent to good public schools, health clinics, parks, community centers, addiction centers & affordable grocery & other stores/services required to live a balanced, healthy life.

 @9M7T7R7  from Missouri answered…2wks2W

No, there is enough empty buildings and houses to completely end involuntary homelessness. The government should incentivize the refurbishment of abandoned homes and buildings.

 @9LW3ZGYfrom Maine answered…3wks3W

bit more nuanced than just yes or no - if constructing high density residential buildings their should be appropriate spaces such as balconies/communal gardens, this kind of space is often neglected when planning the building of such places

 @9LKMVGD from Utah answered…1mo1MO

i think that certain areas should provide certain high density residential areas but not everywhere because of how expensive certain land is.

 @9MKLB7N from New York answered…2 days2D

Yes, but if we're talking converting abandoned buildings, it shouldn't be a "luxury" style home, but something more affordable.

 @6LV5ZML  from Washington answered…3 days3D

Only in certain locations and only if the housing is truly affordable and open to not just low income earners, but the working and middle class as well.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.